Craig Hooper apparently thinks that putting conventional warheads on SLBMs is a good idea.
I disagree, for reasons I blogged about well over a year ago.
Friday, January 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent.You're here, you've consented. If you don't like it, go read some other goddamn blog. It's not as if you're paying me.
2 comments:
But if you put different markings on the missiles, everyone will know they are not nukes, right? :-p
Might want to take a moment to sorta ponder just how our work in Precision Strike might have encouraged other folks to pursue similar design spirals.
Like, oh, the Chinese Carrier Killer of Doooooom!
The reasons for NOT doing this are strong. But could the threat be used as a saber-rattler? To encourage some arms control discussions? Maybe?
Post a Comment