That is my Ruger 22/45 resting on a slow-fire target.
The target looks huge, until you consider that it is a fifty yard target. You shoot a Bullseye match one-handed. At that distance, the 8" bullseye of the target looks about the size of an aspirin tablet. Every slight twitch of the trigger causes the sights to wobble.
At fifty yards, you have ten minutes to get off ten shots. You do that three times. Then you set up 25 yard targets with 5.5" bullseyes. You shoot five shots in 20 seconds, reload, and shoot five more shots. Do that three times. Then you shoot five shots in ten seconds, reload, and shoot five more shots. Do that two more times.
By the end of the match, you've fired 90 rounds. A perfect score would be 900.
Of a dozen shooters, I came in third. I need to do some trigger work to bring the weight of the trigger pull down. I'll probably buy and install a Volquartsen trigger and sear before the next match.
For a full "2700" match, you shoot 90 shots with a .22 rimfire target pistol, 90 shots with a centerfire pistol and 90 with a .45 pistol. A perfect score would be 2700, which nobody has ever attained.
----------------------------------------
I was at a LGS the other day, listening to a guy tell the owner that he had been an early purchaser of a Remington R51. He said that the cocking serrations on the slide were so sharp that he cut his fingers on them. The rear sight fell out of the dovetail. The gun was so buggy that he sent it back to Remington for repairs. They just cut him a check for the full purchase price, including sales tax.
Remington, by all accounts outsourced the R51 to Para Ordnance. Whether the design was flawed or whether the factory either had no functioning QC department or an incompetent one is an open question. I'd sure as hell be leery to buy anything made by Para Ordnance at this point.
Remington's website doesn't catalog the R51. If you're into long-term investing and you can find a new one in the stores, you might want to buy it and just leave it in the box. It will probably be worth some serious coin in 20-30 years or so.
----------------------------------------
BadTux has an idea: The open-carry asshats should be made to carry "Hello Kitty" rifles.
Works for me.
----------------------------------------
Somebody once called YouTube "a reservoir of human stupidity". Over at The Firearms Blog, they've been covering a certain form of stupidity: The Tannerite Arms Race.
Tannerite is a low-grade explosive that requires a lot of shock to set off. People have been buying it to make small exploding targets- hit the target with a rifle and it goes boom.
Well, a certain batch of tools have been mixing up large amounts of Tannerite and then setting it off. One clown blew his old barn with over 150 pounds of the stuff. Some other clowns set twice that amount next to some trees.
As for the first clown, guess nobody told him that there are companies that will happily come out disassemble your old barn, and take it away at no cost to you (and some might even pay you). Because they can sell the wood for making furniture and flooring for hipsters. If the barn had a lot of chestnut wood, you might get a decent check for it. but that's neither here nor there.
What's going to happen, of course, is that the possession and use of Tannerite will end up requiring the same sort of licenses that are required to buy and use dynamite. Because of morons like these. (Yes, folks, there was a time when you would have walked into a rural hardware store and bought a case of dynamite.)
Tannerite + Imbeciles = This is Why We Can't Have Nice Things.
It’s Hard To Top This Kind Of Customized Stupidity
20 minutes ago
4 comments:
Nah, not the kitty. They need to carry these http://www.geekosystem.com/my-little-pony-firearms/
20 percent cooler than Hello Kitty guns.
Bought a house near Eureka about 1980. Out in the garage was an old cardboard box with a half dozen sweaty old sticks of dynamite. Probably 'only' 40 % since that was common for Redwood logging there. With a zillion pound tree down and half buried in dirt you are not about to "throw" a cable around it, you gotta blow a hole under it first.
I had a cold shiver seeing the 'sweat', then got a bucket of cold water and soaked the stuff for 2 weeks. Not sure I'd even do that today.
w3ski
Just purchased a 22/45 lite...
Suggestions for better sights for older eyes ?
Will the same sights fit the lite models as the steel barrel 22/45 ?
Spud, is the top of the receiver drilled/tapped for a rail? Did it come with a rail that can be screwed on?
If so, then I'd say screw the rail on and add a Bushnell TRS-25. MSRP for that sight is $120, but you can find them for a lot less. If not, you might want to look into replacing the sights with FireSights.
Post a Comment