US President-elect Donald Trump has asserted he won the popular vote on 8 November "if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally".Of course, he has no evidence whatsoever to support his claim.
Not having facts or evidence has never stood in the way of that narcissistic nutcase before. Why should it now? The Donald knows nothing and he takes pride in being ignorant.
Kind of like Bush II.
By the way, has anyone set up a "Trump or Orangutan" web page, yet? I don't see one, but there are a shitload of photo comparisons.
I have little doubt that Trump will seek to make any such comparisons illegal.
8 comments:
Such comparisons dmn well ought to be illegal. They're viciously unfair to orangutans.
Yours crankily,
The New York Crank
As much as clinton's lackey Jill Stein claiming Wisconsin had fraud that benefitted Trump.
We KNOW that over 2 million illegals voted.
We KNOW that the majority of those were not for Trump.
Add in the (estimated) 50,000 Dead that voted for Hillary in Chicago and the over a million that voted twice in Chicago and NY and Philly....
He might be right.
But we will never know.
Doesn't matter now.
Just like 2008 and 2012, he is now the POTUS. Like it or leave.
He got those figures from Alex Jones, but is declining his daily security briefing.
"Like it or leave"? Really? How about make me, asshole.
-Doug in Oakland
Back when I was in school, during the Cold War, we were all so smug about the poor Russians who were fed a steady stream of propaganda to keep them ignorant and loyal to the State. We knew so much better than they did!
Now look at us. Teacher never explained that propaganda is stories we want to hear; that we enjoy it because it tells us we were right all along.
Even though T's yaps sound thoughtless and ignorant they work well as distractions and dog whistles. We're in for a helluva ruff ride as he assumes office along w his odious appointees.
B,
Add in the (estimated) 50,000 Dead that voted for Hillary in Chicago and the over a million that voted twice in Chicago and NY and Philly....
Prove it. Without reference to anything on (or originated by) Breitbart News or Alex Jones.
Just like 2008 and 2012, he is now the POTUS. Like it or leave.
Nothing like `08 or `12, where the winner was the clear winner. But you know that. As for "like it or leave", I don't recall ever telling you or anyone else that if they didn't like the outcome, they were free to leave.
Great thing about this country: I am not required to like or swear fealty to the President. If I want to refer to him as "Donald Fucking Trump" or "the Drumpfenführer", then I have the right to do so. Only in pissant dictatorships like North Korea and Belarus does the Dear Leader demand the fealty that you apparently think that we owe Donald the Grifter.
"Like it"? Not going to happen.
Which is a very long-winded way of saying this: What Doug said.
There is no source that you will accept that will cover voter fraud and you know it.
Voter fraud is almost entirely DNC driven, and press that you will accept, like the NYTimes won't cover it 'cause they are in the tank for whomever has a "D" after their name....
But the truth is there...you know it even if you won't admit it.
The truth is that the number of voters purged from the rolls for having common ethnically Democratic leaning names in at least three states is larger than the margin by which Trump won those states.
The truth is that Kobach, after perpetrating this injustice, is now being considered for a top job in Trump's administration.
The truth is that the Republicans cheat. We know they cheat. The fact that we lost is on us for not beating them by enough to overcome their cheating, as we did in '08. It really says something about a political party when they can only win national elections by suppressing the vote.
-Doug in Oakland
Post a Comment