Seen on the street in Kyiv.

Words of Advice:

"If Something Seems To Be Too Good To Be True, It's Best To Shoot It, Just In Case." -- Fiona Glenanne

“The Mob takes the Fifth. If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” -- The TOFF *

"Foreign Relations Boil Down to Two Things: Talking With People or Killing Them." -- Unknown

“Speed is a poor substitute for accuracy.” -- Real, no-shit, fortune from a fortune cookie

"If you believe that you are talking to G-d, you can justify anything.” — my Dad

"Colt .45s; putting bad guys in the ground since 1873." -- Unknown

"Stay Strapped or Get Clapped." -- probably not Mr. Rogers

"The Dildo of Karma rarely comes lubed." -- Unknown

"Eck!" -- George the Cat

* "TOFF" = Treasonous Orange Fat Fuck, A/K/A Dolt-45,
A/K/A Commandante (or Cadet) Bone Spurs,
A/K/A El Caudillo de Mar-a-Lago, A/K/A the Asset., A/K/A P01135809

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Republicans Are Willful Idiots

Republicans announced Thursday that they plan to call a white firefighter to testify against Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor during her Senate confirmation hearings that open Monday.
I have seen nothing to indicate that the 2nd Circuits decision in the Ricci case was not correct in accordance with the then-existing Supreme Court precedent. Lower courts are bound to decide cases based on the guidance of the Supreme Court. If the Supremes later reverse themselves, they are entitled to do that, but no lower court is entitled to decide a case if their decision would contradict what the Supreme Court has previously held.

For Republicans to claim otherwise is nothing more than cynical political grandstanding.

4 comments:

BadTux said...

Cynical public grandstanding? Republicans? You don't say!

- Badtux the Amused Penguin

Comrade Misfit said...

I know, I know, but still, it deserved to be pointed out.

Marc said...

Business as usual, nothing to see, please move along...

lahru said...

This funny. I just posted this five minutes ago over at Out Of The Cornfield.

The first rule of law is blindness, deafness and speechlessness. We have many judges violating one or all of these. You know it is funny that (R)'s rail against legislating from the bench yet when it goes their way they do not see the danger in the precedents it sets. In the Ricci case Sotomayer ruled against them on precedent and the SCOTUS over ruled the previous decision (precedent) the circuit court was mandated to use in it's decision. You won't see that in print anywhere but will come out in her confirmation hearings.