That's what the Mayor of Pittsburgh says. He, instead, thinks gun control is an answer.
I respectfully suggest that the esteemed Mayor of Pittsburgh is very wrong.
It will take little research to determine that the response to state laws imposing registration and/or disposition of "assault-style" rifles and large-capacity magazines have been widely ignored. So, barring an extremely expensive buyback campaign, those guns are going to be there for a very long time. Saying that we can fix this problem by passing more gun-control laws is a pipe dream.
The police are not the answer. The cops were on the scene in minutes, but that was still enough time for the Asswipe to kill nearly a dozen people.
We are, sadly, going to see more of this. Asswipe will be lionized by the neo-Nazis as a hero who had the stones to do more than post nasty things online. The shootings by the Asswipes of Columbine have
inspired a significant number of copycats. It takes no great feat of prognostication to suppose that we won't see more.
What we cannot do: Overreact. As much as I despise the neo-Nazis and their fellow-travelers, trying to stamp them out is folly. Maybe watch them to the full extent permitted by the Constitution, but keep in mind that the Asswipe of Squrrel Hill had no criminal history. There was nothing to him, other than his running his digital mouth, untl yesterday.
Posting guards may make people feel protected. But whether they are professionals...
...or not...
...the main function of a prominent armed guard is to function as a canary in a coal mine: You know there's a problem when he gets shot.
I doubt if many houses of worship are going to tolerate being locked on their Sabbaths. Too many people are coming. Having a security screening checkpoint does a few things: First, it bunches up people. When the attacker's goal is carnage, a mass of potential victims is a desirable thing. Second, unless the screening is under surveillance by more than one armed guard, it's little more than security theater. Third, it may be counterproductive, in that it can discourage attendance.
What can be done?
Change the location of services from time to time. This could also be a nice way for other faiths to stand with the synagogues: They could swap out with the local synagogue on a weekend. The announcements would have to be by word-of-mouth or by ail. Post nothing online until after the fact.
If your congregation bans bringing cell phones to worship, rethink that. Yesterday, people who escaped the carnage were running to houses down the street so they could call the cops.
I know it's anathema to a lot of people to bring guns to services, but rethink that. Active shooter training is nice, but being able to do more than passively resist is better. Three or six people popping at the Asswipe with even J-frames might have had a positive outcome. It could not have been worse.
Finally, there was a time, several decades ago, when there was a wave of synagogue bombing throughout the South. RUMINT was that Mossad quietly contacted the FBI and told them "either you fix this problem or we will." That may be an option once more.