The Cheetah:
By modern standards, they weren't in service for very long.
The 1950s Are Calling, They Want Their Bigotry Back
56 minutes ago
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent.You're here, you've consented. If you don't like it, go read some other goddamn blog. It's not as if you're paying me.
5 comments:
OK, you know about modern jets. I live near Sacramento Airspace, McClellan or whatever and I saw an unusual jet the other day. Triangular wings but no canards and with a conventional tail design.
Moving too high and too fast for any other identification.
Care to venture an idea as to what that might have been? I'm curious.
w3ski
Easiest choices would be A-4 Skyhawk (tail is mid, slightly above the fuselage, but nowhere near a T-tail) or a MIG-21.
OK, and thanks. Front of this beast was longer than either of those aircraft. Long enough body to make me expect the short front wings, but not visible.
Certainly unusual whatever it was. Going fast and to the east.
w3ski
Maybe an SU-9 or -15? Did you have any other ideas about it, that is relative size or number of engines?
Yeah, not too many other matching options, especially that would be flying in the US. Sure you didn't miss the canards? ATAC operates IAI Kfirs that would be flying in that area.
Post a Comment