Words of Advice:
"If Something Seems To Be Too Good To Be True, It's Best To Shoot It, Just In Case." -- Fiona Glenanne
“The Mob takes the Fifth. If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?” -- The TOFF *
"Foreign Relations Boil Down to Two Things: Talking With People or Killing Them." -- Unknown
“Speed is a poor substitute for accuracy.” -- Real, no-shit, fortune from a fortune cookie
"If you believe that you are talking to G-d, you can justify anything.” — my Dad
"Colt .45s; putting bad guys in the ground since 1873." -- Unknown
"Stay Strapped or Get Clapped." -- probably not Mr. Rogers
"The Dildo of Karma rarely comes lubed." -- Unknown
"Eck!" -- George the Cat
* "TOFF" = Treasonous Orange Fat Fuck, A/K/A Dolt-45,
A/K/A Commandante (or Cadet) Bone Spurs,
A/K/A El Caudillo de Mar-a-Lago, A/K/A the Asset., A/K/A P01135809
2 comments:
I remember this being mentioned over at SondraK.com when it broke, and they weren't exactly happy about the situation. If I remember correctly they were blaming the media for leaking it, not the White House.
Anyway...
They've liked to an update from there (went hunting for it when I saw this post) and according to this they've determined that the White House had the video before SITE did, so there's really no threat to future gathering of intel.
Personally, I'm not too worried. The White House might have goofed up, maybe some of the reporters should have kept quiet for a while, I dunno. What I do know is that I find the idea that an international group of criminals (referring to the terrorists there) would get their intel from a newspaper. I wasn't especially irked at the SWIFT "Leak" either: SWIFT published the fact that they worked with government to stop of the flow of money to terrorist groups on their freaking website.
If I remember correctly they were blaming the media for leaking it, not the White House.
The job of reporters is to publish things. If the government wants to keep things secret, they need to stop talking about them to reporters.
Post a Comment