Words of Advice:

"If Something Seems To Be Too Good To Be True, It's Best To Shoot It, Just In Case." -- Fiona Glenanne

"Foreign Relations Boil Down to Two Things: Talking With People or Killing Them." -- Unknown

"Mobs Do Not Storm the Capitol to Do Good Deeds." -- not James Lee Burke

"Colt .45s; putting bad guys underground since 1873." -- Unknown

"Stay Strapped or Get Clapped." -- probably not Mr. Rogers

"Let’s eat all of these people!” — Venom

"Eck!" -- George the Cat

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Trump Wants to Scrap the Constitution and be Named Dictator-for-Life

How many more things does that short-fingered lunatic have to say to convince everyone that he's not fit to be elected as a Killer of Dogs, let alone President?
Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump criticized Democrat Hillary Clinton on Thursday over her trade policies, saying she would handle trade deals so badly that the country should "just cancel the election" and name him the victor.

Speaking to supporters in Toledo, Ohio, Trump said the North American Free Trade Agreement signed by Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, had led to the outsourcing of thousands of Ohio jobs to Mexico, a practice he vowed to stop if elected president on Nov. 8.

"We should just cancel the election and just give it to Trump, right?" he said. "What are we even having it for? Her policies are so bad."
Can you imagine the sheer volume of uproar on the Right if Clinton even hinted at such a thing? But Trump declares that he wants to be named dictator and not a peep.

There are some serious sufferers of Clinton Derangement Syndrome if they would vote for a man who openly aspires to be a dictator. At this point, he really wouldn't lose any votes if there was video showing him setting fire to homeless people.


B said...

Look up "Hyperbole"

Even the press recognizes it.

dinthebeast said...

How about the interview tape where he says he was the best baseball player in all of New York back in '62 or '63 when he went to the military themed boarding school (where the students were handled in a "very rough" manner, making them, but mostly him much tougher than people in the actual military today) and he thought about baseball as a career instead of real estate but he didn't because "baseball wasn't much of a thing back then and there was no money in it."
Didn't the Yankees do pretty well back then?

-Doug in Oakland

Leo Knight said...

In my lower moments, I suspect his followers would love him more if he st fire to homeless people.

New Jovian Thunderbolt said...

Wouldn't that be great?! Don't tease us, so.

Still better than Romney.

thinkingman said...

Careful there, EBM. Your (blue) colors are showing. How you can be so blind to HRCs many evidenced violations of law, which , if committed by you, would have you imprisoned for the remainder of your life many times over, is beyond pathetic.Yes, I know this is YOUR bolg, and as such, you have Dictatorial rights over what gets shown in it. Go ahead and block me form your site, this message was for YOU.
Have a nice day.

D. said...

The movie pitch would be "Not since Idi Amin Dada..."

The Yankees were doing well, but you couldn't get robber-baron-rich on a player's salary back then.

Comrade Misfit said...

"thinkingman", go read the caption at the top of this blog, just below the title.

Frankly, I don't shiv a git what "crimes" you think HRC has committed. It's all bullshit allegations, at least, at this point. What I see are conservatives, like you, eagerly supporting a man who has apparently never read the Constitution and who has expressed, openly, disdain for many of its provisions.

Frankly, at this point, I am beginning to regard support for Trump as grounds for suspicion of sedition.

Comrade Misfit said...

B, I stand on my point that if Clinton had said that, 99.99% of the people now saying "oh, it's just more of Donald's hyperbole" would be fucking losing their shit right now.

You might be one of the few exceptions.

thinkingman said...

OH I see. So Trump gets his feet held to your imaginary coals, while Crooked HRC gets a pass, again and again and again.How about having 33000 emails bleached when they were subpoenaed? Are you really so dense as to believe they were about yoga class, and thus required elimination by a means so thorough that they became irretrievable? How about the "Pay for Play" scandals, too numerous to list here. Hillary lied and people died, or did you forget that, also? How about the current Wikileaks emails revealing more than most Democrats are comfortable with, and HRCs hilarious effort to blame it on the Russians? OH right . What a conundrum; they are your buddies. What to do? Do you hate them, or thank them , or accept that they most likely are being used as just another excuse to lay the blame elsewhere? Bullshit allegations? Clean out your headgear. I won't even get started on HRCs violent supporter, truly the blight of society.
As for your byline, I recall when Democrats were NOT socialist ( at best!). SOOO pathetic when self described "pinkos" pretend to be merely Democrats by a show of support. ( in the manner of HRC )For one who refers to "Democraps", you support them so blindly that the contradiction is glaring.
Trump is no daisy, but neither is he a manure pile.
As for suspicion of sedition, since when is having an opinion which differs from that of a blogger sedition? Perhaps there is a Doctor near to you who can help with your unreasonable suspicions.

Anonymous said...

EB, you might consider doing your regular readers a favor and blocking "thinkingman." Maybe?

Thanks for your attention.


Marc said...

As for anything which is cited as 'evidence' from Wikileaks, some folks may have to revisit the idea of how the 'evidence' was obtained, and just how useful it is in a court of law.

Comrade Misfit said...

Jill, nah. He's basically begged for such treatment and I'm not playing that game.

Besides, anyone who now thinks that Wikileaks is an honest source is flying their Russian-tool flag.