Ruger is now offering its Super Redhawk in 10mm Auto.
Unless you have a real need to shoot 10mm, my initial reaction is that this doesn't pass the Wuffo Test.
The Super Redhawk is a 54oz gun. Almost all of the other Super Redhawks are in more potent calibers. From what I can see, a 10mm doesn't do anything that a .41 Magnum can't.
My real beef is that the 10mm is a rimless cartridge, so you'd need some flavor of moon clip in order to extract the fired case. That's just one more little bit of metal, and if you're going to avoid bending them, you'll need a "mooning" and "demooning" tools. If they do get bent, then they'll likely jam the gun.
To my mind, one of the advantages of a revolver is that you don't need to have anything else: Just ammunition to shoot. Oh, sure, you can get speedloaders for a faster reload. If you're a serious competition shooter, you can have them set for moon clips for revolver rounds. But the guns so converted will still chamber, fire and extract single rounds.
If you lose the moonclips for a revolver firing automatic cartridges, or if the clips are damaged, you have a gun that is a paperweight. If the chambers are set to headspace the rounds on the cartridge mouths, you have a gun that you can shoot, provided that you have a dowel rod with which to punch out the empties.
I don't know of what can be done in any of the revolvers chambered for autoloading cartridges that can't be done with an equivalent revolver round, which is both rimmed and crimped for use in revolvers.
But what the hell do I know. If a 10mm revolver floats yer boat, break out your plastic and go for it.
Cat Pawtector!
2 hours ago
2 comments:
/k/ was having fun with this a couple of days ago.
I want Ruger to bring back the Magnum carbines and/ or good leverguns with loading gates.
10mm is an autopistol round. Not a revolver round. Using it in a revolver is Just Wrong, considering that there are equally good revolver rounds that are actually designed for the purpose. As you point out, a rimless round isn't made for revolvers and should not be used in revolvers, period. As a pistol round it's a pretty potent round, better ballistics than .45 ACP and plenty of stopping stopping power, but as a revolver round? Really?!
Post a Comment