The TOFF diverted military funds for his wall and it was legal.
So why not do the same thing for Ukraine?
The Appeasement Caucus, apparently, wants to pull out of NATO and break our security treaties. Since they don't want to help Ukraine, they sure as shit won't help Taiwan. So what do we need B-21s for, or more Virginia-class subs? We're not going to help our friends, the GOP Surrender Monkeys will see to that.
It's not a "peace dividend", it's the GOP Surrender Dividend.
The Midnight Boxing Match
20 minutes ago
3 comments:
Given around 90% of money spent on/given to on Ukraine is being spent in the U.S., the Rethuglican caucus is literally taking work from Americans.
Maybe need to look at putting any additional munitions plants in states that aren't against honoring our international commitments.
It was not much mentioned, but the latest National Defense Authorization Act (Which passed) requires congressional approval for withdrawal from NATO. Not good that it had to be done, but it was bipartisan and firewalls off the possibility of a president just nuking the alliance.Also encouraging because it acknowledges that the alliance benefits all members.
Post a Comment