
All right, I can hear the comments: I have written before that the 1911 Colt is the gold standard of handguns and the .45ACP is the gold standard of cartridges. How then can I, in all good conscience, opt for a different handgun firing an inferior cartridge? The FBI, after all, ditched the 9mm for .40s.
All true. But the PT-92 has one feature that the 1911 lacks: The ability to be fired in double-action for the first shot. This means that I can keep the weapon fully loaded, with a round chambered. I do not need to work any safeties or anything other than the trigger, just point at a target and fire. Then the weapon shifts into SA mode, which I have a fair amount of familiarity with, and the controls on the weapon function in the same way as a 1911's do.
Add to that is the fact that this particular gun has never jammed or failed to feed on me. So, to my mind, I have a handgun that has reasonable power, a considerable ammunition load, reliability and ease of operation.
So when there is a reason to reach for a pistol, it's the PT-92 for me.
(Your mileage may vary.)
Sixteen years later: The gun is long gone, after two moves, the last one to a high-cap ban state. I sold it before the move, along with other non-compliant guns that I didn't see a need to keep.
