Attorney General Pam Bondi has threatened to prosecute a former private employee at Office Depot for refusing to print flyers for a Charlie Kirk vigil.
...
“Businesses cannot discriminate,” Bondi said, referring to the Office Depot incident. “If you wanna go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.”.
If Charlie Kirk had thrown a gay wedding and he couldn't get a cake, Bondi would have spun her head around in confusion as to whether or not she should be outraged.
11 comments:
Next level of management spoke the person was fired. It was work and
an employee refused it. End of discussion.
But the karens can't take no.
Eck!
My daughter was approached at her place of employment and told to stop posting about that low life and the flag in my small town is at half-mast, fucked or what
Patrick
Eck!
But the fact that Bondi thinks that this is a prosecutable offense shows (again) her failure to understand the Constitution and demonstrates her unfitness for the office.
Having said that, your side thought it was a great idea to sue over a Christian bakery refusing to bake a cake for a gay couple.
2 different standards when it is convenient is kinda bad, doncha think?
Which one is the one you believe in? Or do your beliefs and morals change depending upon the argument and the players?
Excluding that bondi is an idiot. Your point is?
My side? What side will that be?
Like I said its pointless to argue with irrational people.
You have nothing to offer but the desire to invoke chaos.
You only see those that agree with you and your standard
and those that don't.
Your all about "us" and "them", division.
You claim to know but have learned nothing.
You attempt to beat people with your stupidity.
Most consider you a nuisance.
Be gone fool.
Eck!
"Your side" is those for whom you advocate and support.
We can agree that Bondi is an idiot.
I see those (like you)who would change their standard depending on the argument or the current social meme. Who judge those with whom they disagree differently and with different standards than those with whom they disagree or do not identify with.
You get angry when I point out your inconsistency.
If it were *your* blog, I would leave if asked. But our kind hostess has chosen to allow my comments. Not your call.
The ones who consider me a nuisance are disturbed because I point out the truth and the fallacies of their thinking and it angers and disturbs them
Thanks Eck. Couldn't have said it better. But it seems to be hard wired into the self-proclaimed conservative mindset that everything is either/or, totally black or white and there is no middle ground. Their whole world is "us" vs, "them".
Trump uses it, Faux News uses it, Reagan used it but a bit more subtly, Joe McCarthy used it, Hitler used it as so many dictators have before and now.
That;'s why you don't see too many scientists, writers of actual decent thoughtful and non-propaganda work and other talented and educated people that are conservative. Or those that don't think empathy is a major fault.
B, I wasn’t around when “my side” made the determination to sue the baker over the gay wedding case fiasco. Unlike
the Hulk Hogan vs Gawker fiasco there were no third parties involved besides the individuals who filed said lawsuit, to lend them aid and support aside from any GoFundMe account that was opened for that specific matter.
Demonstrating you think of the Left as some groupthink monster tells us more about the side you’re on than about the folks who did initiate the lawsuit in the first place.
You just have to get the last pointless word in.
Eck!
I simply responded to your question. Explained what "side" I was referring to. SOrry you think a reasoned response was pointless.
But that is the heart of it, innit? You can't make it on logic so you claim it all is "Pointless" when you disagree but cannot rebut.
The ENTIRE Left agreed that the Baker was wrong, and piled on against him. But now, that the shoe is on the other hand, the Left is against the same thing.
Yes, the Left has a Groupthink Monster...so does the RIght, (and early every group) but at least the Right seems to (mostly) use logic instead of emotion.
This is getting circular.
We’re done.
Post a Comment