I've written, a time or two, about FireClean's suing bloggers for basically saying that their product was very similar to vegetable oil.
For their second try at the apple, FireClean filed its case in Arizona (FireClean v. Tuohy, 4:16-cv-00604, ED-AZ).
The case was dismissed by the parties, with prejudice, in February (the order was signed off by the judge on March 1st).
I'm not going to go through the docket file, not at ten cents a page. There was a lot of arguing over discovery and motions to strike FireClean's experts.
So what happened? Your guess is as good as mine. But it's over. And, as far as I can tell, nobody anywhere in the gunnie press is talking about it.
Thursday, April 18, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I could take a stab at summarizing all such cases: Money changed hands, few were satisfied.
Post a Comment