Orange Felon Can't Tell Me What to Do

Words of Advice:

DONALD TRUMP IS A CONVICTED FELON (AND EPSTEIN'S BFF). CASE CLOSED.

"America, where we restrict access to vaccines and healthcare, but you can have all the guns you want." -- Stonekettle

"If Something Seems To Be Too Good To Be True, It's Best To Shoot It, Just In Case." -- Fiona Glenanne

“Speed is a poor substitute for accuracy.” -- Real, no-shit, fortune from a fortune cookie

"Thou Shalt Get Sidetracked by Bullshit, Every Goddamned Time." -- The Ghoul

"If you believe that you are talking to G-d, you can justify anything.” — my Dad

If something sounds good in your head, don't let it come out of your mouth.

"Colt .45s; putting bad guys in the ground since 1873." -- Unknown

"Tear Gas Tastes Like Fascism." -- Unknown

"Eck!" -- George the Cat

Karma may sometimes be late to arrive.
But it never loses an address.

Friday, March 12, 2010

At What Point Do We Stop Ascribing Any "Moral Authority" to These Ghouls?

Why does anyone continue to attribute any degree of moral authority to what is turning out to be the world's largest ring of pedophiles?
Pope Benedict XVI has for the first time been drawn into the Catholic sex abuse scandal in his home country of Germany.

His former archdiocese of Munich has acknowledged that, while he was in charge, it dealt with a suspected paedophile priest by transferring him to a different parish where he went on to commit sex offences against children. The revelation has drawn attention to Benedict's handling of abuse claims, both when archbishop and later as a prefect of the Vatican office dealing with such crimes, a position he held until becoming pope in 2005.

Yesterday, the head of the German Catholic bishop's conference, Archbishop Robert Zollitsch, revealed he was investigating more than 170 allegations of abuse in the church's institutions. The scandal broke in January when it was alleged that, over a period of 30 years, priests found to be abusing children had been redeployed to other parishes rather than dismissed.
Time and time again, it seems, that the institution of the Catholic Church is more interested in protecting the reputations of its priests and avoiding embarrassment than it is in protecting children in its charge. Everywhere this sort of story breaks in the world, it is the same sordid tale of the victims being hushed up and the predators being quietly transferred to fresh hunting grounds.

At what point do we start regarding the hierarchy of the Catholic Church as a criminal enterprise and begin treating them in that way?

More Than One in Five Iraq War & Aghan War Vets...

...are out of work. The percentage is 21.%.

Recall all those commercials about how military service was an advantage in the civilian job market? Look at the last line of text on this site, for example:
No matter where life takes you, the U.S. Armed Forces is a great place to start.
Double the unemployment rate when you get out? Great selling point.

Another for Cranky

Who loves All Things Zombie..

demotivational posters

This would also be primo for fending off zombies:

The Torturer's Favoite Justice

Clarence Thomas, who thinks that it is perfectly OK for prison guards to beat prisoners. Up to a certain point, that is, which would seem to not exist in his mind.

0400

Double-teamed purr-bombing.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

When Salt is Outlawed, Only Outlaws Will Have Salt!

Of all of the troubles facing the state of New York, including a highly dysfunctional legislature, a politically-neutered governor and a whopping budget deficit, some asswipe of an assemblyman from Brooklyn is seeking to make it a crime for a chef to prepare food if one of the ingredients is salt. Send four meals out with a pinch of salt added, that's four violations.

So this would become a criminal instrument in a restaurant kitchen in New York, if that jerkoff's bill were to become law:Don't those fuckers have anything better to do in Albany? Has winter completely addled their brains? I wish this was a joke, but it is not.

The true joke, of course, is the NY State Legislature, the Official State Circus.

(H/T)

Flying Cattle Cars

Fixer on flying the airlines:
I've been flying since I was 4 years old, when my parents would put me on a plane (Lufthansa or IcelandAir 707) in the summer and send me to Germany to stay with the family until September. It used to be an event. Men would dress (I gotta dig up a pic of me in my little suit with a bow tie) for the occasion and customer service was Job One.

The flying experience was something to be enjoyed; gate agents and crew doing their best to make you feel at ease and rested by the time you got where you were going. In 30 years, it's turned into a nightmare; something to be avoided at all costs in my book.
As Don Brown has pointed out, the airline business was created by the government and, for most of their history, depended on government subsidies to develop airplanes and for operating subsidies. The original subsidies were paid though the Post Office for carrying airmail.[1] If you look at a photograph of a pre-war airliner, you may see a notation of "AM-#", which referred to the airmail route flown by the airplane.

The Federal government controlled what airlines flew what routes, how often, and approved their rates. That left customer service as the one area where the airlines could compete with each other. And they did. You could check the bags you wanted, up to a maximum weight that almost nobody ever reached. Flights had meals. The only charges assessed, and only in coach, were for alcoholic beverages and movie headsets.

But then came deregulation.[2] Airlines began competing on price, and they did.

This was the life of a pre-deregulation stewardess. This was the life of a post-deregulation, pre 9-11 flight attendant. (And post-9-11.)

Airlines quickly learned that most travelers cared only about two things: Whether they could get a flight to where they wanted to go and how much it cost. Airlines have tried, from time to time, to increase the distance between seat row ("seat pitch") and advertised that as "giving you more leg room." But time and time again, they have found out that passengers will fly the other carriers' sardine cans if the price is right.

Then, of course, came 9-11 and the focus on security. Airline crews realized that they could have a complaining traveler arrested if they so chose, and many chose to wield that power like a NYPD cop. Flight attendants have been known to threaten even mildly complaining passengers with arrest.

And then the airlines figured out that they can extort fees from passengers for everything. Paper ticket: Pay a fee. You want to check a bag: Pay a fee. You want a can of soda: Oh, that'll cost you. Blankets and those scummy pillows are either gone altogether or you can pay a fee. People ponied up.

So now what? After 30+ years, we aren't going to go back to the days when the CAB controlled the airlines. The only tool we have, now, and it is one everyone has, is to choose not to fly when you can.

And when the airlines scream to the government how they need subsidies for something, call your congressman and push back at the bastards.

[1] Did you know that from the 1920s through at least WW2, airline pilots were required to carry firearms for the protection of the U.S. Mail?
[2] The next time you find yourself in an aerial livestock carrier with flight attendants who have all the personality of CIA torturers, remember to thank Jimmy Carter.

Possession of a Snowball is a Felony?

Apparently so, at least in New York City, where four young men were having a snowball fight. One of the snowballs hit a plainclothes cop, who pulled a gun on the four dudes, called for backup, and arrested them for criminal possession of a weapon.

And people wonder why the NYPD is regarded by millions as an "army of occupation"...

(H/T)

What Universe Do the Villagers Live in?

Certainly not ours:
House Democratic leaders on Wednesday banned budget earmarks to private industry, ending a practice that has steered billions of dollars in no-bid contracts to companies and set off corruption scandals. ... The House ban came less than two weeks after the public release of an investigation by the Office of Congressional Ethics laid bare the pay-to-play culture on Capitol Hill, particularly on the defense appropriations subcommittee. The report found that there was a “widespread perception” among the private-sector recipients of earmarks that giving political contributions to lawmakers on the panel helped secure the grants.
Wow. Earmarks are rife with corruption? Who knew? [/sarcasm]

Of course the whole earmark process is ridden with corruption or, if not outright cash-in-the-freezer corruption, the more subtle "I'll get you the earmark and you'll be so grateful that you'll make a suitable campaign contribution" kind.

There may be a good earmark out there, sort of like the idea that there may be an honest mortgage broker, but they are few and far between. They ought to be banned outright.

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

Apologies to Commenters

Three of my blogs now have been hit with waves of comment spam from fucking Chinese language spammers. They are either paying workers to deal with captcha verification or they have developed a bot to deal with it.

Either way, I have enabled comment moderation on my blogs. I hate doing that, for it really kills off the dynamics of people commenting, but I also don't want to have to spend the time deleting tens of spam comments.

I'd rant about how I really hate those low-life fuckers, but I'd be preaching to the choir on this one.