A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Explosive and the City 2 | ||||
| www.thedailyshow.com | ||||
| ||||
European Union laws require you to give European Union visitors information about cookies used on your blog. In many cases, these laws also require you to obtain consent.You're here, you've consented. If you don't like it, go read some other goddamn blog. It's not as if you're paying me.
4 comments:
I recall the justification for police officers being issued tazers was that they would be "the last resort before lethal force." The idea was that they were to be used (in most circumstances) as the last alternative to drawing an actual weapon.
It seems that, in many cases, they've now become the first thing an officer reaches for.
(I think the kid in Philly had more to do with Officer Bagadonuts not really being able to chase him down without throwing an MI. Not that that excuses him.)
My recollection is the same with regard to how tasers were marketed.
Now they are being used as a compliance/torture device.
When the Tasers were first issued, the police that were authorized to carry them had to be tazed themselves to experience what they might have to inflict on another person. Are the police still required to be tazed to qualify to be armed with a Taser?
That's a good question. I don't know the answer to it.
Post a Comment