A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Tuesday, January 23, 2024
.32 Revival
This one, I am seriously meh about. If a K-frame-sized .32 is an offering, a seven-shot gun would be a better idea. Otherwise, if you're shooting a medium-frame gun, why not stick with a .38? For one thing, ammunition is far more widely available and cheaper, to boot.
But that's me talking out of my ass, I've never seen one.
6 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
I thought the 7 round cylinder was the whole point of 327 Federal Magnum. It does seem strange to make it in a six-shooter like that.
ReplyDeleteBecause you can't fit seven charge holes in the 856/327 cylinder, that's why. Even if you miraculously could, there's no way it would contain the 45k psi chamber pressures of .327 Fed.
ReplyDeleteApparently it's closer to a Colt D-frame than a S&W K-frame in size, so the point about the pressure of .327s is a good one. (I thought that the gun was a little larger.)
ReplyDeleteYeah, that's also the reason the 856 is not available in .357 Mag.
ReplyDeleteAnd thanks for the link, Tam.
ReplyDeleteWell then the design is just plain stupid, that solves that.
ReplyDelete