The TOFF diverted military funds for his wall and it was legal.
So why not do the same thing for Ukraine?
The Appeasement Caucus, apparently, wants to pull out of NATO and break our security treaties. Since they don't want to help Ukraine, they sure as shit won't help Taiwan. So what do we need B-21s for, or more Virginia-class subs? We're not going to help our friends, the GOP Surrender Monkeys will see to that.
It's not a "peace dividend", it's the GOP Surrender Dividend.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Tuesday, December 12, 2023
3 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Given around 90% of money spent on/given to on Ukraine is being spent in the U.S., the Rethuglican caucus is literally taking work from Americans.
ReplyDeleteMaybe need to look at putting any additional munitions plants in states that aren't against honoring our international commitments.
ReplyDeleteIt was not much mentioned, but the latest National Defense Authorization Act (Which passed) requires congressional approval for withdrawal from NATO. Not good that it had to be done, but it was bipartisan and firewalls off the possibility of a president just nuking the alliance.Also encouraging because it acknowledges that the alliance benefits all members.
ReplyDelete