DC-8s were not as famous as the 707s, but they were far more versatile. DC-8s were more easily stretched and they could be reengined and/or fitted with "hush kits" to meet noise regulations. Forty years after they went out of production, you can often still find one in the air, earning its keep.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Sunday, October 6, 2013
Your Sunday Morning Jet Noise
DC-8s were not as famous as the 707s, but they were far more versatile. DC-8s were more easily stretched and they could be reengined and/or fitted with "hush kits" to meet noise regulations. Forty years after they went out of production, you can often still find one in the air, earning its keep.
7 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
I got a kick from the "left-handed salute" just prior to run-up for taxiout.
ReplyDeleteI worked hundreds of DC-8s in my years. First, Easterns, Deltas, and Nationals (none of whom flew the 7-oh, to my recollection—in fact, it was very rare to see a 7-oh of anyone's in ZJX), and some lesser marques, as well.
ReplyDeleteWhen I got to ORD and ZAU, United, of course, with ORD being their home base, had zillions of them, but Flying Tigers flew them, too.
Re-engined indeed. United refit lots of them with CFM-56 high bypass engines. They developed so much thrust just at idle, that the age old choice controllers had to make—get down or slow down (lots of speed control within 150 miles of destination, and we did a lot of it) was magnified with the high bypass 8s.
Pilots don't like to use the speed boards (spoilers) as they cause a "rumble" throughout the airframe that they're concerned passengers find unsettling, so sometimes a little extra vector was needed to give them enough real estate to get down.
Oh, the memories.
LRod
ZJX, ORD, ZAU retired
Ah, that noise. Sounds like a 707 or 720 anyway.
ReplyDeleteAt first I thought it may have been a famous JAL DC-8-62, ship JAL 8032.
Ah, the "Shiga Maru".
ReplyDeleteI forgot to mention, we also referred to them as "Diesel 8s", a play on the "DC" (Douglas Corporation, if you didn't know) part of the contraction. Oddly enough, even though I probably worked just as many DC-9s, and a surprising number of DC-6s, we never referred to them as "Diesel Xes".
ReplyDeleteAnd if you're wondering why the gap between the DC-6 and the DC-8? I asked a DC-6 flight once why so many 6s flying and virtually no 7s. The answer? Fuel. The DC-6 used R-2800 engines which once burned 100/130 avgas, but can be made to burn today's 100LL. The 7s, on the other hand, had R-3350 engines, which burned 115/145—no longer available—and apparently aren't easily retrofitted to burn 100LL.
LRod
ZJX, ORD, ZAU retired
P.S. EBM, did you get the Corry Climax image I sent (I used the email addy from our AT&T conversation)?
ReplyDeleteLRod, I did get the image.
ReplyDeleteAs for the DC-7s, one old pilot said that "DC-6s were four-engined airplanes with three-bladed props and DC-7s were three-engined airplanes with four-bladed props."