A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
"The military services have worked and reworked the requirements for these programs to ensure that we do not find ourselves, after spending billions on development, with a system we can't afford to produce."Yeah, like that'll ever happen.
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Then there's Augustine's Law #16 "which shows that defense budgets grow linearly but the unit cost of a new military aircraft grows exponentially:
ReplyDeleteIn the year 2054, the entire defence budget will purchase just one aircraft. This aircraft will have to be shared by the Air Force and Navy 3½ days each per week except for leap year, when it will be made available to the Marines for the extra day."
Don't believe it? See the graphical proof here, with major military aircraft costs showing the way...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustine%27s_laws
This time they are going to begin with a system we can't afford to produce. Bigger toys means better generals.
ReplyDeleteNorthrop Grumman still has the B2 molds and could punch those suckers out for a unit cost of around $350M apiece. Upgrade with some modern robotics and you're *much* cheaper.
ReplyDeleteNote that the B-2 is a hangar queen, but that's because of the RF-absorbant coating. If you just want some unmanned B-2s loitering as bomb trucks over Afghanistan and don't care about the stealth properties of the plane, maintenance is on par with most modern jets. Same deal with cruise missiles. Right now the B-2 has no provisions to carry cruise missiles, they simply aren't useful for its primary mission of penetration. But slinging a couple of Tomahawks under its belly would be child's play if you didn't care about radar signature...
But dusting off those old molds wouldn't be as profitable as a new hangar queen, so (shrug). In any event, something has to be done to replace the B-1's, whose swing wings are coming to end of life, and B-52's, which are older than the grandfathers of the kids flying them. It's not a "has to be done tomorrow" thing, but start of development clearly has to be done *sometime* in the near future or the U.S. loses its heavy bomb truck capability. Which might be a good thing, actually, but I doubt you'll find any politicians or Air Force types who'll agree... empire is too deep in their blood.
- Badtux the Flightless Penguin