That's what the Taser folks are now advising, because of the risk of inducing an "adverse cardiac event", which is medicalese for "death".
They defibrillate a heart by applying an electric shock. Electrocution kills people by stopping the heart. So why anyone ever thought that it would be perfectly harmless to blast a person's torso with an electric shock is rather incomprehensible.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
But...but...think of the CHILDREN!
ReplyDeleteUhm, given that Tasers are pretty much impossible to aim at anything *but* the center of mass given their woeful inaccuracy (they're low-velocity darts dangling wires behind them, for pete's sake!), what the Taser folks just said was, "don't Taser people." At which point one asks... uhm.... why are police officers carrying these things, again?
ReplyDelete- Badtux the Bad Aim Penguin