The "Baghdad Bobs" of the 1st Cav ought to re-visit that portion of their oath about "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States", before they start being asked hostile questions which originate from the E-Ring of Ft. Fumble.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Some Things Never Change; Stars & Stripes Edition, Pt. 2
The MSM is beginning to pay attention. The thrust is clear, the sin of the reporter was that he refused to write the stories that the duty liarspublic affairs officers wanted him to run.
The "Baghdad Bobs" of the 1st Cav ought to re-visit that portion of their oath about "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States", before they start being asked hostile questions which originate from the E-Ring of Ft. Fumble.
The "Baghdad Bobs" of the 1st Cav ought to re-visit that portion of their oath about "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States", before they start being asked hostile questions which originate from the E-Ring of Ft. Fumble.
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
I wouldn't want a biased reporter in there either. They didn't have a problem with what he wrote, it is what he refused to write that was at isssue. He basically wrote all about the people who wanted the US Military out, but didn't write anything about the people that want them to stay. His lack of objectivity along with his breaking of other rules (communications during blackout!) warrants the actions taken. He violated the mandate of objective reporting.
ReplyDeleteNo, what he violated was that he wouldn't report what the 1st Cav PAOs wanted him to report. What we wouldn't do, in essence, was take 1st Cav's point of view and print it as fact.
ReplyDelete1st Cav wanted a propagandist, not a reporter.