The Washington Post (I've linked to the story on MSNBC) has a story today about how the Saudis are treating its citizens who have been released from Gulag Guantanamo.
There was this line: "Steven Emerson, a terrorism analyst, said the program is intriguing because it is an alternative to holding detainees at Guantanamo indefinitely. But, he said, there is a "major risk" of releasing former detainees into the general population."
Well, no fucking shit, genius. You hold people in stark conditions, without trial, for over half a decade. You torture some of them. And then, when they are released, you express some concern that they may have taken serious offense about the way they have been treated and that they might want some revenge?
No comments:
Post a Comment
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.