With all of the modern, edgy and funny comic strips out there, I don't see why newspapers continue to run "Peanuts."
First off, Charles M. Schultz is dead. Get over it.
Second, these publications are called "newspapers." They aren't "history lessons printed on pulp," they're supposed to print the "news". If it happened before your last deadline, it ain't news, it's history.
If people want to read "Peanuts", direct them to the nearest bookstore or the library. If you are going to run old comics, why don't you just stop paying your editorial cartoonists and run Thomas Nash's old stuff? Or better yet, run Herblock, since his cartoons of Nixon's evil deeds are timely once again.
Ditch "Peanuts."
No comments:
Post a Comment
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.