A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, October 16, 2020
Because It's Friday
One thing about Garretts made no sense to me: Why the cylinders were placed as far as possible from the boiler. That means that the steam lines from the throttle dome have longer to run and that the exhaust from the cylinders also have further to go before they are exhuasted out the blastpiple. The engines of a steam locomotive don't really care in which direction they run; see, the Southern Pacific's Cab-Forwards.
4 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
If the cylinders were at the other end of the driver units, I think they'd interfere with the articulation joints.
ReplyDeleteTrue, they'd have to make an already-long locomotive even longer. Which means bigger turntables, etc.
ReplyDeleteBut it also allows for a lower locomotive, plus the equivalent of two engines in one.
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it have also been an issue that as water and fuel were consumed, the reduced weight on the drivers would have had an effect on traction? Still, a handsome locomotive.
ReplyDelete