Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Expecting the FAA to Make Any Sense is Like Expecting Congress to Do Its Job

The FAA is mulling over whether or not to let some angle-of-attack indicators be installed in small airplanes without a Supplemental Type Certificate.

Mostly, the FAA is not in favor of it. They want the AOA manufacturers to get STCs.

This makes no sense. It's pretty hard to find anyone who is familiar with AOA indicators who doesn't think that they're the best safety addition to aircraft since shoulder harnesses. The mantra of carrier pilots is "meatball (glideslope), lineup, angle-of-attack". If you fly with the AOA in the green, you won't stall out. Which means that in a landing pattern, you won't get into the "stall-spin-crash-burn-die" cycle.

But hey, the FAA says that the files must be papered. Doesn't matter how many people die. The AOA makers aren't going to get STCs for airplanes that don't have thousands of candidates.

This is reminsicent of the FAA's former insistence that one had to have an STC or field approval to install retrofit shoulder harnesses. Eventually, it got through the FAA's extremely dense collective skull that a hell of a lot of people were getting killed or horribly disfigured because older airplane didn't have shoulder harnesses and the reason the owners didn't install them was because the FAA was making it almost impossible to do so. Because when you ask for a "field approval", that goes to the local Flight Standards District Office. The responsible guy in the Fairbanks FSDO might say: "Hey, this is a good idea, do it" while the throwback in the Jackson office might have taken the position that "if they were meant to be installed, Bill Piper would have installed them". (Names of FSDOs pulled at random, so STFU.)

If AOA indicators are a good idea, let's let owners fucking install them.

4 comments:

  1. Okay, you motivated me to get a rescue cat. Now just a question, any suggestions on how one would go about picking out a flight school. Started to learn once but ended up married and broke. Now old and tired but have time and hopefully the means. Would flying be like horses where you make a small fortune by starting with a large fortune?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Flying is like that. It can be very costly.

    First, I'd figure out if you were medically qualified. You can go read Part 67 of the Federal Air Regulations and discuss any concerns with your doctor. If you do have some issues and you still want to fly, you can do light sport or fly gliders. But you can't do that if you go for a medical and are denied (I think).

    If you have medical issues, you should join AOPA and then bounce it off them.

    If you are medically qualified, then you can think about finding a flight school.

    I put it in that order because I've known folks who sunk a few grand into lessons for pre-solo, got near to it, went for their medical and then found out that they weren't qualified for one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gee, I guess I'll just have to stick to the old tried n' true method of waiting for the stall horn then lowering the nose until it stops. Thanks, FAA!

    ReplyDelete
  4. That is totally screwed up... but then again, it IS the FAA...

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.