Sen. Mitch McConnell has written an opinion piece in the NY Times saying that we cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the 1930s. This is a non-paywalled link to the piece.
What McConnell only hints at is that the difficulty in the 2020s when it comes to resisting Russian aggression comes from within his own party, just as it did in the 1930s, when the isolationists (and the Nazi sympathizers) were also in his own party.
The recent gains on the battlefield by the Russians were as a direct result of Republicans delaying aid to Ukraine for nearly half-a-year. Of course, you won't hear McConnell acknowledging that fact, either.
So his opinion peace is pretty weak sauce.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, June 7, 2024
4 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
I saw Biden apologize to Zylensky for the delay in aid. How do you apologize for however many deaths that lack of aid cost them? We really don't want Ukraine to win, do we?
ReplyDeletew3ski
Matt Gaetz and Марджори Робертoba Зелёная (MTG in her native Russian) should be the ones making an apology to the Ukrainian people.
ReplyDeleteEverything about MushMouth McConnell is weak sauce these days. He already did enough damage before he turned into the dying old man that he is. He has no power and his so called friends are waiting for him to get out of the way.
ReplyDeleteThat is just what you do with old mistakes: you repeat them. To do otherwise implicitly concedes that somebody, somewhere, knows better -- and that cannot be allowed.
ReplyDelete