These are the congressmen who voted against revoking Russia's normal trade status: GOP Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona, Dan Bishop of North Carolina, Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Matt Gaetz of Florida, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, Glenn Grothman of Wisconsin, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Chip Roy of Texas.
Some of them are part of the usual gang of Q-spouting idiots. All of them are embarrassments to their districts.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Thursday, March 17, 2022
10 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Not necessarily on topic: no need to post....Didja see where the NYT admitted that the Hunter Biden laptop story was real? You know, the one that they (and you) claimed was "Russian Disinformation"...alongside your claim that Trump was the puppet of Putin? Looks like you were wrong on both counts.
ReplyDeleteOne wonders why the Liberal press would hide such information (and, in fact, do what they could to discredit the story) until more than a year after the election....?
Just sayin'
Wow, he had a laptop! Amazing. Yawn
DeleteCare to comment how you can refer to a story in the NYT and then claim that the “liberal press” is covering up the story.
ReplyDeleteFrankly, you seem to me to be driven by your ideology, which causes me to discount everything you say/claim.
I refer to them covering up the story for more than two years. You seem to have missed (or ignored) that part.
ReplyDeleteThe Post covered it BEFORE the election., as did other (non-DNC supporting) outlets. But the Times (and other Left-leaning publications) claimed it was "Russian Disinformation" until now. They flat out lied. Why is that?
Why the change?
Why did they do their best to ignore and/or discredit the story before the election?
Those emails were obtained by The New York Times from a cache of files that appears to have cyouome from a laptop abandoned by Mr. Biden in a Delaware repair shop. The email and others in the cache were authenticated by people familiar with them and with the investigation.
ReplyDeleteThat’s from the NYT article in question. Appears seems to be doing a lot of work here.
This is from 2021:
John Ratcliffe, the director of national intelligence, also told Fox Business Network that the “laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign.” But Mr. Ratcliffe, who has been criticized for embracing the president’s political agenda in a traditionally apolitical job, did not make clear whether the intelligence agencies or the F.B.I. authenticated the laptop’s contents or whether he was simply saying that they had not gathered evidence that Russia altered any of the material.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/us/politics/hunter-biden-laptop.amp.html
Of course, Trump is being investigated about his own taxes.
People who obsess and believe in this conspiracy nonsense (there was “evidence” about a Joe Biden meeting when he was VP that never took place)are people who likely can’t tell the difference between shit and shinola.
Last word on this, B: You have your own blog. Take up the matter there. If you want to, feel free to say "I'm discussing Hunter's laptop here" and provide a link.
ReplyDeleteThis is my blog. Not yours.
I find it funny that I was ‘dis-invited’ to comment on B’s site for ‘allegedly’ going off the topic of the the original post. And yet, here he does the same on someone else’s blog. Can you say hypocrite?
ReplyDeleteDale
Yeah, well, I’m no longer allowing it.
ReplyDeleteAnd McCarthy won't do anything about them because he needs their votes to become speaker. Same with Cawthorn.
ReplyDelete-Doug in Sugar Pine
I said, people, that I am no linger allowing off-topic comments.
ReplyDeleteTwo have tested me already. Their comments have been deleted.
You know who you are.
KNOCK THAT SHIT OFF!!