He's still earning his pay.
Friday, June 11, 2021
18 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Time for the Rosenberg treatment.
ReplyDeleteJust a suggestion.
Dale
If it likes it there so much, maybe it should go live there.
ReplyDeleteYes, it.
The one area where he shows a work ethic……
ReplyDeleteWhat did Trump do to Russia's benefit?
ReplyDeleteBiden has already done much to make Putin happy. But he isn't Trump, so....
0_0
ReplyDeleteLaundered their money, spilled US state secrets from his treasonous ass to boss Vlad in secret meetings, no response to Russian hacks (acts of war), no response or interest in Russian bounties on US troops (why was that, you think). Putin is his very model and the GRU's running of turncoat trump was the greatest intelligence/ subversion coup for Russia (or anyone else!) since WWII's Lucy ring. A triumph for the cute little murderous and maximum corrupt dictator. But despite Vlad's help again in 2020 his puppet lost badly. People had seen enough of him.
So 0_0, as a war vet I take it amiss to see a sexually twisted, deeply corrupt and vile tax evading draft dodging turncoat dotard selling the USA down the the motherfucking river to our nation's enemy for money. But heh, if you and the GQP are fine with treason then who am I to scold. Go in peace, brother. But trump and his turncoat mob need to serve hard time.
Double-ought might be on to something there. Bear with me: I'm still not unconvinced drumpf uck isn't a secret dem out to destroy the repubescent party, the "charismatic leader" of the bare-footed barely literate rubes sprawled drooling Pavlovianly across a couch the backseat out of a '69 International Travelall drunk as a skunk on the Ambien, Prozac, Viagra and bimbo bottle-blonde crotch-shots on Fox Kool-Aid blindly following a charismatic "leader" to suicide ... but the repubescents have for generations been the war-party, the national security party, the "let's kick Russia's ass yesterday" party. The party that has traditionally been the most guarded, for lack of a better term, in dealing with, the greater threat to, Russia and her plans. If not in ruins no longer a threat. Commie pinko quers.
ReplyDeleteThat Vlad, like everyone else playing this game, is still stuck in the twentieth century is moot in the generally accepted vernacular ... a boondoggle, a waste of time and energy.
One from the vaults
ReplyDeletehttps://2016electioninvestigation.com/2017/03/16/towers-full-of-oligarchs-and-their-dirty-money/
Tod- your veteran status adds nothing to the debate, this is the Internet.
ReplyDeleteNext, point us to some evidence of those assertions. Apparently you are unaware of, for instance, the bounty story not being credible to US intelligence and defense agencies.
Find some evidence of treason. It shouldn't be so difficult.
>sexually twisted, deeply corrupt and vile tax evading draft dodging turncoat dotard
When did we start talking about Biden?
"What did Trump do to Russia's benefit?"
ReplyDeleteWell, the decimation of the state department was one of the first presents, the turning against Ukraine was one of the other presents, the elevation of Russian propaganda on the world stage above our own intelligence services was another...
Maybe a better question would be what did Fergus do that wasn't to Russia's benefit?
Although I doubt any real affinity Fergus had for Putin was nearly as important as the fact that his idiot hordes view Russia as white, so anything he did that helped Russia actually helped him in the eyes of his racist base.
-Doug in Sugar Pine
Why was Putin the only person that Trump truly deferred to? Why did Trump make the statement about Hillary’s e-mail beginning “Russia, if you’re listening?”
ReplyDeleteQuit peeing on our shoes and telling us it’s raining, 0_0. We are not that stupid.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
1984 George Orwell née Eric Blair
That statement must have been written by a junior high student.
ReplyDeleteThat and there are two stories.. one involves unicorns and the
Whitehouse.
Eck!
I noticed that y'all are not really ansereing 0_0's questions, just repating the (mostly debunked) memes that you like to toss around.
ReplyDeleteI find that telling.
I answered them B. Read it. It's three comments up from yours.
ReplyDelete-Doug in Sugar Pine
O_O, if you deny that what Trump did with Putin, Kim Jong Un and others was adhering to our enemies, giving them aid and comfort, you are either lying or in a state of deep denial.
ReplyDeletehttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Links_between_Trump_associates_and_Russian_officials#Overview
ReplyDeleteThe Moscow Project — an initiative of the Center for American Progress Action Fund — had, by June 3, 2019, documented "272 contacts between Trump's team and Russia-linked operatives ... including at least 38 meetings.... None of these contacts were ever reported to the proper authorities. Instead, the Trump team tried to cover up every single one of them."[27]
The New York Times reported in June 2021 that in 2017 and 2018 the Justice Department subpoenaed metadata from the iCloud accounts of at least a dozen individuals associated with the House Intelligence Committee, including that of Democrat ranking member Adam Schiff and Eric Swalwell, and family members, to investigate leaks to the press about contacts between Trump associates and Russia. Records of the inquiry did not implicate anyone associated with the committee, but upon becoming attorney general Bill Barr revived the effort, including by appointing a federal prosecutor and about six others in February 2020. The Times reported that, apart from corruption investigations, subpoenaing communications information of members of Congress is nearly unheard-of, and that some in the Justice Department saw Barr's approach as politically motivated.[28][29] Justice Department inspector general Michael Horowitz announced an inquiry into the matter the day after the Times report.[30]
Try again, B.
Took half a century but I made it to five foot five. Taller than Putin, pipsqueak.
ReplyDeleteCan't tell me the mainstream media isn't in the bag for the NAZIs, when it (NBC) is handing that snot-nosed albino monkey a prime-time platform to spread misinformation to the heartland. Is Russia TV giving Joe Biden a platform to spread misinformation? No. Your mainstream media are NAZIs.
McVeigh hit the wrong building ...
It's like nobody has heard of Nord Stream II here.
ReplyDeleteActions, not Trump's often silly off-the-cuff words.
Actions. Like the gutting of the damn state department.
ReplyDelete-Doug in Sugar Pine