So who was that guy? His name was Nawres Waleed Hamid. He was a translator in Kirkuq. He was an immigrant and a Muslim, a man in two groups that Trump and his in-house Nazi routinely scapegoat.
That Trump would take a chance of going to war over the death of a man whom, if Trump had had his way, would have never set foot in this country, pegs the Irony Meter.
Does Trump really hate Muslims? Or does he dislike those who come here and fail to adjust to our way of life and insist that we adjust to them?
ReplyDeleteIt seems pretty clear from his past statements. "Total and complete shutdown of Muslim immigration" seems pretty clear to me.
ReplyDeleteGame, set and match to Comrade.
ReplyDeleteLook at any decision Donnie makes with an eye to race or religion, and you’ll correctly predict our Presidential response. Hell, he’s still for hanging the Central Park Five, despite DNA evidence absolving them...let’s guess why, eh?
Oh, forgot to ask B, why aren’t we all living in teepees or lodges and living with nature? After all, immigrants should assimilate, eh?
ReplyDeleteJust because he's conveniently dead doesn't mean Fergus would ever have let him in the country.
ReplyDeleteAlso, respect for the dead isn't Fergus' thing, no matter what they might have done for the country, so this seems a lot like opportunistic bullshit to me, especially in light of the assassination being approved months ago.
-Doug in Oakland
Ms Misfit: The complete quote (not the truncated one you keep repeating) is:
ReplyDelete"a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on".
Not quite the same thing.
And CP: Nope, the white european folks weren't immigrants. They were invaders. But you know that, you just like to twist things.
Saudi Arabia, where most of the 9/11 hijackers came from, was never on Trump’s list of Muslim countries to have their population banned from the US.
ReplyDeleteWhy is that, B? Maybe Donnie loves the KSA more than he loves America?
B.:
ReplyDelete1) You then intend to say that non-assimilating Muslims and Hispanics are invaders.
2) Your argument is that invaders need to be prevented from entry.
3) So all us white invaders should be arrested and sent home, right?
Twisted enough? The reality is that’s your argument in a nutshell.