A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Monday, April 15, 2019
Fire at Notre Dame
It took over 100 years to built it and an evening to burn a lot of it to ash.
8 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePerhaps flying water tankers could be used to put it out.” The sheer ignorance of this tweet is stunning, water weighs 8.34 pounds per gallon. The impact of even a Bambi Bucket of water, around 1-2,000 gallons of water, would likely destroy parts of the structure. That would be 8,340 to 16,680 pounds of water dropped. in a single mass, onto a structure that is already destabilized. The only tweet in English today by French Emergency Services was one that specifically ruled out the use of airborne water tankers.
ReplyDeleteThis is the “stable genius”, who knows more about pretty much anything than anyone else. Good Grief, shut up!
"Stable genius" is an accurate term, for what he knows is horseshit.
ReplyDeleteOur Anacephalic-in-Chief.
Oh the humanity....
ReplyDeleteIt would be nice if some archaeologists got to dig a bit in places they never could have otherwise.
ReplyDeleteAir tankers are what you use when you can't get there with fire trucks. Trucks deliver much more water per hour, and with much better accuracy.
ReplyDeleteNan, the damage is almost exclusively in the upper reaches of the structure. The stone vaults over three of the four arms of the building held, only the north vault is reported to have failed to any extent. This also explains why there are pictures of the interior with candles standing unmelted.
ReplyDeleteThat being said, with the damage to the stone over the years, and the huge funds being pledged for repair, they is a decent chance that some work will extend under the ground in that area.
On a related note, the release of lead must have been immense, as the primary constituent of the roof sheeting was lead...melting in the flames. Not sure how volatile lead is in a fire like this, but I suspect that the whole area around the Notre Dame is now contaminated.
CP88: I stole part of your comment and used it elsewhere, with attribution, of course.
ReplyDelete-Doug in Oakland