A 27-year-old Indian man plans to sue his parents for giving birth to him without his consent.It would seem reasonable that if somebody is complaining that he should not have been born, the equitable solution would be to off one's self. . If one is not willing to do that, then one has, in essence, ratified and accepted being born.
Mumbai businessman Raphael Samuel told the BBC that it's wrong to bring children into the world because they then have to put up with lifelong suffering.
Mr Samuel, of course, understands that our consent can't be sought before we are born, but insists that "it was not our decision to be born".
So as we didn't ask to be born, we should be paid for the rest of our lives to live, he argues.
If this clown wants damages for the rest of his life, then the court should require that he mitigate his damages and give him a goodly length of rope and directions to the nearest stout tree.
This case should be filed under Assholes, Greedy; people can be such
No comments:
Post a Comment
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.