Sunday, February 10, 2019

That Was Forseeable; Tabloid Ed.

As I expected, Pecker's lawyer said that The National Enquirer's telling Bezos "w'll publish your dick pics if you don't do what we want isn't blackmail/extortion.
The National Enquirer committed neither extortion nor blackmail by threatening to publish intimate photos of Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, an attorney for the head of the tabloid’s parent company said Sunday.
You can read the emails here.

Also, AMI's lawyer might be jammed up, too.

2 comments:

  1. So it seems no charges will be filed and it at most will come down to lawyers and long drawn out court battles. How sad. How can blackmail ever be prosecuted when it comes down to "he said, she said"?
    w3ski

    ReplyDelete
  2. It can be prosecuted when there is hard evidence, such as emails.

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.