A bar in Minneapolis shut down after it came to light that the owner gave money to David Duke's campaign.
In California, a restaurant critic named Christina Waters thinks OK to patronize neo-nazi businesses if their food is good.
Pro tip: Support neo-nazi politicians running for Federal office and you can be found out.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Sunday, September 3, 2017
4 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Did you see Dan Savage's advice column where he said "Don't fuck Nazis"?
ReplyDelete"Don't fuck Nazis.
If someone you just met tells you they're a Nazi, don't fuck that Nazi. If you're already fucking someone and they reveal themselves to be a Nazi, stop fucking that Nazi. If someone tells you they're a Nazi and you fuck that Nazi anyway and then keep fucking that Nazi because they're so goddamn good at sex (for a Nazi), your effort to "gently guide" that Nazi away from being a Nazi doesn't make it okay to fuck that Nazi."
-Doug in Oakland
Lately I have taken to boycotting the businesses that let them in the door.
ReplyDeleteAAAANND Free Speech at it's finest.
ReplyDeleteBoth ways.
The owner can do what he wants with his money. And the patrons and employees can do that with the business as well.
No one ever said Free Speech should be without consequences.
As long as it is allowed, then the chips fall where they will.
I strongly support their right to give the donations. And I strongly support the fact that their patrons left 'em too.
If someone didn't want to publicly admit to being a Duke supporter, could they get away with using another name? How about someone nasty enough to be willing to donate to Duke who wants to cause trouble for someone else? I don't actually know, but I'd like a bit more evidence than "name showed up on a list". Maybe there's more proof than I'm aware of, maybe it's harder to fake a donation than I believe--in that case, freedom shouldn't mean free from consequences.
ReplyDelete