Hans von Spakovsky, a Heritage Foundation fellow, last week argued that the Supreme Court should count the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's votes in cases in which the justices have already cast preliminary votes.Because, what, no justice ever has changed their vote prior to the final one?
Bullshit. And of course, if they thought that Scalia was going to vote against them, they'd be arguing the exact opposite.
By the way, why weren't the GOP officials at the Nevada caucus demanding photo ID?
...and then there's the "equally valid" argument that the 100 or so Senators up for re-election next year shouldn't be involved in advise and consent if it happens while they're in office.
ReplyDeleteFolks, you can't make this stuff up.
Why, that's a splendid idea. Let's let Thurgood Marshall and Earl Warren vote too!
ReplyDelete