Thursday, January 28, 2016

Thirty Years Ago

Space Shuttle Challenger exploded just over a minute after liftoff.


Seven astronauts were killed that frigid January morning.


The failures in management that led to the explosion were many, mostly ones of "we did this before and nothing bad happened"-- which, in retrospect, was like proclaiming that Russian Roulette is a safe game because the hammer fell on empty chambers in the first two tries.

In a public demonstration, using o-ring material and ice water, Richard Feynman showed why Challenger blew up. Arguably, much of the credit for uncovering and making public the cause of the disaster is Feynman's.

But did NASA learn from the loss of Challenger? Probably not.

2 comments:

  1. The ice-water trick was nice enough in itself, but it was really a brilliant ploy to force the Rogers Commission to include his full report, which went much deeper. Lots of people at NASA quietly helped him with it, and he saw to it that nobody was exposed to reprisals.

    Sadly, the Manhattan Project was already killing him as he wrapped it up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I fully believe that the Rogers Commission would have been a whitewash job without Feynman.

    The ice water demonstration was terrific in that it made the problem clear to the public.

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.