I would expect that to be the outcome. For the Army's gold-plated new modular handgun contract is now running north of a billion, with the cost of the guns to be over a grand apiece.
Expect some sharp-eyed Senator to figure out that the Army could just buy more M9s for less than half the cost per unit. When that happens, the "modular handgun project" will be as dead as most of the Army's other procurement programs in recent memory.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Tuesday, December 15, 2015
4 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Interesting apropos comment here:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/10/daniel-zimmerman/beretta-m9-gets-respect/
I've had a Taurus PT92 for a couple of decades. (Beretta built the Brazilian production line and then sold it to Taurus.) I have nothing bad to say about it.
ReplyDeleteI also have an old Taurus PT92 that never fails. What is 'modular'? And why is it expensive and something we need?
ReplyDeleteAt a grand a pistol or more, no, we don't need it. They probably do need to buy new guns, but the boyos at Ft. Fumble are going to screw the pooch, yet again.
ReplyDelete