SWA flew out their 737 from KPLK, probably at minimum fuel.
No surprise there, that 737 wasn't making them any money sitting on the ground.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Monday, January 13, 2014
4 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Couldn't tell if he was hanging the tail out over grass... but I can tell he wanted to.
ReplyDeleteWell he was beyond Taxiway A at Runway 30, which means he used every bit of asphalt available. Interestingly, they had enough gas to fly to TUL rather than just hopping to KBBG (7 NM SE), so they didn't need to strip the plane down that much.
ReplyDeleteAs a side note, while noodling around on this and similar things, I ran across the TACA 110 report (that was the 737-300 that flamed out near New Orleans in 1988 and landed on a grass levee...a heck of a piloting job by a one-eyed Captain). In reviewing that, I noticed that the plane involved later was sold to SWA and is still flying for them (N697SW).
That flight was the reason that 300-500 series 737's had a placard limiting minimum N1 (I think it was N1, it's been a while) percentage in rain.
This is going to be an interesting investigation to watch...
ReplyDeleteMy wager would be that the cockpit crew gets a 180-day sitdown from the Feds and that SWA cans them.
ReplyDelete