From Boeing, the difference in noise between a 707 and a 787.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Sunday, July 7, 2013
5 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Two vs. four, but also the difference between pre-noise pollution/post and pure turbine (707) and turbofan (787). And the other piece is the advances in technology in 50 years!!!
ReplyDeleteThose four JT3D-3Bs had 18,000lbs of thrust apiece, while those two GEnx engines have about 57,000lbs of thrust apiece.
ReplyDeleteCool.
ReplyDeleteI still loved #1.
ReplyDeleteBear
Went to an air show a few months ago (before obummer killed them off) and saw F-16s, F-18s, and F-22s in action. I've always loved the noise and enjoyed the F-16 for that reason. The F-22 is an amazing bird, but you just can't beat the sky-ripping noise of the older engines.
ReplyDelete