A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Even in the Best Case, Over Five Million GPS Units Will Be Frelled by LightSquared
LightSquared is, of course, outraged. They say that "only 10%" of GPS units will be unusable if they can build their network. When you count installed units, portable units and cell phones, I'd guess that would mean that fifteen million or more GPS units would be fucked up, even with LightSquared's optimistic figures.
So tens of millions of people would have to replace their cell phones and other GPS units, all so that some billionaire hedge-fund asswipe can make even more money.
3 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
I can think of a new hobby for when I'm lost.
ReplyDeleteAnd since I know the government won't be able to track my location, given that my surveillance device is not operational, I'll have an alibi.
75% or 10%. If one of the units frelled is yours the number really doesn't make any difference. All you care about, if you are not lost, is who will pay for a new one.
ReplyDeleteThe solution is obvious. LightSquared should be allowed to build their network but should be required to replace all of the devices that break because of their network. Making a device obsolete is a cost of building the network and it seems clear to me that the builder of the network should bear that cost.
ReplyDelete