It extends to how they drink water. There is a fascinating article about that in the NY Times, or you can read the original engineering report in Science.
Science also reported that the Webb Space Telescope is about 30% over budget and a year behind schedule, and that is a best-case scenario. Given that the Federal budgeteers are trying to cut wherever they can, the chances that NASA is going to get extra money for the Webb are somewhere between slim and none. Which mans other programs at NASA will be cut.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, November 12, 2010
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Maybe they should just launch all the parts up into orbit, and finish the work in space. Sounds expensive, but it worked the last time.
ReplyDeleteWon't work, because the Webb Telescope would be out at one of the LaGrange points, far, far out of reach of human spacecraft.
ReplyDelete