Monday, June 21, 2010

Did the FAA Drop The Ball, Too?

To Hell with the alphabet groups, I wonder if the FAA knew about this.
on or about

2 comments:

  1. Eck!6/21/2010 9:18 AM

    The FAA has been silent.

    There is a lot in that R/O like 8.33khz
    (3:1) splitting of channels. You think
    760 channel radios cost wait for the
    2000 plus channel radios.

    One thing for certain it's not spectrum grab as all the frequencies argued over are for aircraft use though seems the commercials have the big knife in the pie.

    Eck!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Comrade Misfit6/21/2010 10:27 AM

    This is all driving me out of the aircraft ownership game. I'm hanging on by my fingertips as it is without having to drop a few more AMUs into replacement avionics. Having to deal with the mandatory upgrade from 360 to 760 channel radios was bad enough.

    There are far fewer airplanes out there than there were 15 or 30 years ago.

    What the fuck?

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.