Local animal rescue workers have volunteered to help treat birds affected by the slick and to collect data that would also be used to help calculate penalties for the spill. But federal officials have told the volunteers that the work must be done by a company hired by BP.The Obama Administration needs to get of the bed that it is sharing with BP.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, May 21, 2010
Conflict of Interest, Ya Think??- BP Edition
The Federales are willingly letting BP control virtually everything. Including the data developed about the extent of the oil pollution on the Gulf shores.
3 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
What's more cost effective? Wiping down slicked birds and beasts one at a time, or tossing them all into a chipper/shredder?
ReplyDeleteHmmmm...
Obama better sniff the political wind and figure out a better way to handle this. I'd hate to be on the side of the teabaggers.
I wonder if the CG will be in charge of checking the id's of volunteers . . . ?
ReplyDeleteNangleator, I know how you feel. I had to bite my tongue today and admit that Rush Limbaugh was right (almost) when he called this situation "Obama's Katrina". From the incompetence to the emphasis upon PR to the attempts at covering up the extent of the problem, Obama's response has been almost 100% the same as Bush's was to Katrina. Well, with one exception. Bush was venal and incompetent because, well, that's what he was. Obama, on the other hand, appears to be doing it in order to benefit a foreign company. However evil the Bushies were, at least they weren't doing so in service to the British, yo. So in that respect, the Obama Administration's response has been WORSE than Katrina. A fact which I have a major problem with, yo.
ReplyDelete- Badtux the Tongue-biting Penguin