The Ninth Circuit has effectively legalized the use of torture by the police.
The Taser was marketed to the cops as an alternative to lethal force. That is what it should be regarded as; if the law does not support shooting someone, it should not be legal to use a Taser. That may be a strict view, but in light of the fact that the cops are using Tasers for situations where, in the past, they could not have even justified using a nightstick, the use of Tasers ought to be virtually banned.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
1 comment:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Perhaps the news stories should be written like this:
ReplyDeleteCops manfully resist gunning down a dangerous pregnant woman who viciously attacked three officers by sitting in her car and not obeying their commands quickly nor obsequiously enough. Their minimal torturing of the criminal was deemed 'not excessive' and 'fucking funny' according to a Federal Appeals court. Court recommendations for future pregnant woman encounters involve preventative heavy machine gun fire to protect our police officers' precious, precious safety. Critics maintain that police departments should stop hiring pants-shitting cowards and little, tin dictators, but such critics will soon be executed.