Craig Hooper apparently thinks that putting conventional warheads on SLBMs is a good idea.
I disagree, for reasons I blogged about well over a year ago.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, January 8, 2010
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
But if you put different markings on the missiles, everyone will know they are not nukes, right? :-p
ReplyDeleteMight want to take a moment to sorta ponder just how our work in Precision Strike might have encouraged other folks to pursue similar design spirals.
ReplyDeleteLike, oh, the Chinese Carrier Killer of Doooooom!
The reasons for NOT doing this are strong. But could the threat be used as a saber-rattler? To encourage some arms control discussions? Maybe?