NEW YORK (Reuters) - The head of the Senate Banking Committee may scrap the idea of creating a consumer financial protection agency, the Wall Street Journal said on Friday citing people familiar with the matter.The only reason to seek a bipartisan deal is because that way, nobody needs that untrustworthy old scumbag Lieberman in order to pass a bill. But the sad truth of the matter for the last century has been that the Republicans will line up, in lock-step, to protect the interests of the banks and to screw over working Americans. It was true in 1929, it was true when the Regan Administration deregulated the savings-and-loan industry (resulting in a massive wave of bank failures) and it has been true over the last decade (de-regulating the banks, refusal to regulate derivatives and mortgages), resulting in the worst economic downturn since the Depression.
Such a decision would set back White House efforts to overhaul financial sector regulations.
Sen. Christopher Dodd has discussed abandoning the idea for an agency with key Senate Republicans as a way to secure a bipartisan deal on legislation, the newspaper said, citing the people.
In that regard, Dodd has been a virtual member of the Republican party. He, like all of the Republicans and a disgusting number of Democrats, was a supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy "reform" bill, which was a giant reach-around to the banks by the Congress. When it comes to looking out for the interests of the middle class, the working class and the poor, Dodd has consistently come down on the side of the banks and Wall Street. In no small degree, part of the responsibility for the looting of the economy by the financiers and the current recession can be laid at Dodd's feet.
He is a weasel. He won't be missed by Americans who were not already in George W. Bush's base (those who made over $300,000 a year).
At this point in history I'd really like to know if any senators actually work for the majority of the public. I've become so cynical that I can't name 5 that regularly vote for or introduce bills that make life better for the majority instead of the rich.
ReplyDeleteSanders (VT), Feingold (WI), Cantwell (WA), Brown (OH),
ReplyDelete... I know I can do it, give me a minute...
Franken (MN)!
(whew, that was close)
Joe
ReplyDeleteI knew that someone could do it. But come on, only 5% of the senators actually work for the people? How fucked are we? And yes that's a rhetorical question.