A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Monday, December 7, 2009
Seward's Folly
Well, it seems that the detractors were right. Russia got rid of a territory that was, at the time, too distant from St. Petersburg to be administered with any degree of efficiency. The United States was, as a result, saddled with a territory that, over the following 140 years, has proven itself to be a money sink.
If you page down to the appendix of the study, you will see that the Gadsten Purchase (portions of New Mexico and Arizona) in 1854 and the purchase of the U.S. Virgin Islands in 1917 have also proven to be money sinks. Only the "purchase" of Hawaii in 1898 was a monetary benefit to the nation.
Who can we sell Alaska to?
1 comment:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
The Gadsden Purchase had another reason for being, though -- the Southern route of an intercontinental railroad, one that would stay open all winter without being occasionally covered by snow avalanches. The former Southern Pacific Railroad goes through Tucson connecting the ports of San Diego and Los Angeles to the Southeast, and if you consider the costs of diverting all that traffic further north you end up making the Gadsden Purchase well worth it.
ReplyDelete- Badtux the Transportation Penguin