That is the equation that ought to be kept in mind when reading about China's finishing the construction of an old Soviet aircraft carrier and training pilots. For if China intends to operate her carrier at any significant distance from her home port in China, she will need at least three, if not four carriers in order to sustain one at sea.
Three is the bare minimum. Four is better. Four gives you one ship on station, one ship in a major maintenance availability (ie, an overhaul), one ship working up to deploy to relieve the ship on station, and one ship which has recently returned and is undergoing the training and maintenance to prepare for her next deployment. The four-to-one rule also applies to the escorts and the aircraft units.
A carrier that is conducting extensive air operations needs supply ships to resupply her on a frequent basis. The further away the carrier is operating from her base of supply, the more supply ships are needed. It could be that they will need five sets of replenishment ships to keep one carrier group at sea on an extended deployment, and that is with none of the supply ships out of service for maintenance and overhauls.
For a nation with one or two carriers, they are better viewed as mobile coastal airfields which probably won't be operating more than a few hundred miles, at best, from their ports. One or two Chinese carriers may unsettle the other nations of East Asia, but they will not be a significant threat to any other area.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Thursday, October 22, 2009
5 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
Your calculations are correct and it remains to be seen how many they will build as they learn to build them better. And they have plenty of our dollars to do it with.
ReplyDeleteTrue, but by the time China can build and man a carrier fleet of 8+ CVs, most of us will be long dead.
ReplyDeleteWhat do you mean "we"?
ReplyDeleteIt's possible they could have them operational in a couple of decades, maybe less. They've been studying the technology for some time. We build carriers one at a time, mostly to keep the shipyard busy, I suppose. China might could conceivably set different industrial priorities.
Cujo, it's not just building the carriers. It's building up the entire aviation and training pipeline to supply the trained pilots. It's having enough pilots who have had a tour of duty on a carrier to act as instructors to the new pilots. It's having enough experienced mid and senior grade pilots to fill the leadership jobs in the aviation squadrons. It's having enough experienced naval officers to operate the carriers themselves.
ReplyDeleteSame thing for the escorts, the supply ships, the repair ships.
In some ways, building the ships is the easy part.
Unless China has some notion in some of its own "Neocons" to attack and conquer other nations, this ship is probably meant to be like other floating museums. (I'm kidding about that). Why would China build numbers of aircraft carriers and the infrastructure to support them? Yeah, she has the money to do it but so did we. Operative word "did."
ReplyDelete