Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Faking DNA Evidence

It apparently is not that difficult to do. If the lab has the DNA profile of the suspect (not even an actual sample, just the profile), they can make the test results match the profile.

Since there has been no shortage of crime labs that have skewed or even faked tests to "prove" the guilt of people that the cops wanted to convict (the FBI and Texas crime labs come readily to mind), this should be a serious concern.

I remember that there was a cop-killing in Boston about 20 years ago; the cops were so sure they had their man, but the physican evidence was lacking, so they transferred his fingerprint onto the weapon. The defense expert spotted it and the jury acquitted him.

Eyewitness testimony is malleable, witnesses lie, physical evidence can be forged. On the other side, there is witness intimidation and experts for hire.

So who do you believe?

(H/T)

1 comment:

  1. The last voice we hear?

    Easily led American,

    S

    (Just kiddin'!)

    ReplyDelete

House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.

In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.

All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.

(Please don't feed the trolls.)

中國詞不評論,冒抹除的風險。僅英語。

COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.