Some legal scholars think it will be difficult to indict Dick Cheney, George Tenet, Porter Goss, Donald Rumsfeld (and George Bush. I submit that they are overthinking the problem.
The obvious charge is a charge of command responsibility, otherwise known as the Yamashita (or Medina) Doctrine.
These are the elements of the charge:
1) A war crime has been committed;
2) Those committing the atrocities/war crimes were under the command of the defendant;
3) The commander knew or should have known, based on the surrounding circumstances at the time, that the subordinates were engaging impermissible conduct; and
4) The commander failed to prevent or punish those responsible for the commission of such crimes.
The last three elements are "gimmies." The torturers both in the CIA and in the military were under the command of Bush and Cheney. The military torturers were under the command of Rumsfeld, the CIA torturers were under the command of Tenet and Goss. The four potential defendants not only knew of the commission of war crimes (element 3), they authorized and approved of them (element 4). That is clear from the record and from the statements of many of the defendants, which would be admissible.
So the sole area to argue about at trial will be whether war crimes took place.
I don't see the prosecution's case-in-chief taking longer than a day to put on after the opening statements are made. The defense is going to have to argue on the first element. They will have to argue that the torture wasn't really torture, for the other elements of the charge are indeed "gimmies" to the prosecution.
Trying the bosses will not be hard. That is why you probably will not see any of the senior officials of the Bush Administration taking any trips to Europe anytime soon.
If you do not think that a charge of command responsibility is not a serious one, consider this:
We hung General Yamashita.
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Thursday, April 23, 2009
5 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
There's also precedent in the trial of Slobodan Milošević, a national leader charged with genocide and violations of the Geneva Convention.
ReplyDeleteThat trial was a clusterfuck; the Tribunal in the Hauge made it seem as they'd have a problem trying a simple moving violation.
ReplyDeleteYeah, but Yamashita was a darkie furriner speakin' that funny furrin gabble speak, not a real person like Dear Former Leader and His holy crusaders. That makes a difference, yessiree.
ReplyDelete- Badtux the Cynical Penguin
BadTux, there is something to your point.
ReplyDeleteWe Yamashits wasn't hung. He was hanged. The past participle of "hang" (by the neck 'til ye be dead) is "hanged".
ReplyDeleteMinor point, I know.