I ranted this morning that the congressional Democrats seemed to be hell-bent on fucking up the same way they did in 1994.
Seems that Nancy Pelosi is saying "not so fast." And at least two Democratic senators have said they oppose reinstating the Brady Bill "assault rifle" ban. Which means they'd need more than a few Republican senators would have to cross over to vote for a new ban.
Which isn't going to happen in the rational-based universe.
(H/T to Marko)
A blog by a "sucker" and a "loser" who served her country in the Navy.
If you're one of the Covidiots who believe that COVID-19 is "just the flu",
that the 2020 election was stolen, or
especially if you supported the 1/6/21 insurrection,
leave now.
Slava Ukraini!
Friday, February 27, 2009
2 comments:
House Rules #1, #2 and #6 apply to all comments. Rule #3 also applies to political comments.
In short, don't be a jackass. THIS MEANS YOU!
If you never see your comments posted, see Rule #7.
All comments must be on point and address either the points raised in the blog post or points raised by commenters in response.
Any comments that drift off onto other topics are subject to deletion.
(Please don't feed the trolls.)
中國詞不評論，冒抹除的風險。僅英語。
COMMENT MODERATION IS IN EFFECT UFN. This means that if you are an insulting dick, nobody will ever see it.
There should be many more than two Democrats that would vote against an AWB, many more.
ReplyDeleteEarl, I agree. I can probably come up with maybe six senators, if not more, who would be against an AWB.
ReplyDeleteThere will be no AWB in this Congress or, for that matter, the next few. Talk about such is only good for appeasing the gun-control lunatics in the Democratic party and for fund-raising by the 2nd Amendment groups.